Leadvixo vs Kaspr:
phone data, tech stack targeting, and what else matters.

Yes. Leadvixo's Chrome extension lets you reveal contact details — email and phone — directly on LinkedIn profiles and company pages, without leaving the platform. Kaspr's extension is more deeply integrated with LinkedIn Sales Navigator specifically, so if you rely on Sales Navigator's workflow natively, Kaspr's extension may feel more native. For general LinkedIn usage, both extensions work comparably.

Kaspr was built primarily as a LinkedIn data enrichment tool — its core use case is: you're already on a LinkedIn profile, you want the phone number and email. It doesn't have a standalone prospecting database for searching companies by size, industry, or tech stack. Leadvixo was built as a full prospecting platform, so company search and tech stack filtering are core features, not add-ons. If your workflow starts on LinkedIn for every contact, Kaspr fits that motion well. If you also do outbound from account lists or ICP-based company searches, Kaspr leaves a gap that Leadvixo fills.

Yes. Leadvixo's free plan gives you 100 credits/month — enough to reveal 100 verified contacts — with no credit card required. Kaspr requires paid subscription from day one. This means you can test Leadvixo's data quality on your actual ICP before spending anything. If the data holds up for your market and use case, upgrading to Pro (€49/mo) or Scale (€99/mo flat for the team) becomes a straightforward decision.

Yes, and some teams do exactly this — using Leadvixo for company-level prospecting and bulk people search (especially with tech stack filtering), and Kaspr specifically for LinkedIn-native phone data on high-priority accounts. That said, for most teams the overlap in functionality and budget means choosing one makes more financial sense. The free plan makes it easy to test Leadvixo before making that call.