Comparison · 2026
vs
Lusha
Leadvixo vs Lusha:
verified data, better pricing, and what the difference actually means.
Lusha is one of the most recognised names in B2B contact data — strong on verified emails, popular Chrome extension, and a clean UI. The gap shows up in team pricing, tech stack filtering, and export flexibility. Here's the honest breakdown for 2026.
🏆
Quick verdict
Leadvixo wins for teams doing volume prospecting — flat pricing, unlimited export, tech stack filtering, and real-time verification at a lower all-in cost. Lusha wins for individuals who want a polished, LinkedIn-focused tool with no friction and are comfortable paying per seat.
200M+
Verified contacts
94%+
Email deliverability
€99
Flat team plan/mo
∞
CSV export on paid plans
500+
Tech stack filters
At a glance
What each tool
is actually built for.
Leadvixo
Best for: teams & volume outbound
✅Real-time SMTP email verification — 94%+ deliverability
✅Tech stack filtering — 500+ technologies
✅Company search — 32M+ with firmographic filters
✅Flat team pricing — €99/mo for the whole team
✅Unlimited CSV export on paid plans
✅Free plan — 100 credits, no card required
⚠️UI less polished than Lusha for individual daily use
vs
Lusha
Best for: individual users & LinkedIn
✅Clean, polished UI — minimal learning curve
✅Strong LinkedIn Chrome extension
✅Solid email and phone data quality
✅Good Salesforce and HubSpot integrations
⚠️Per-seat pricing — costs multiply fast for teams
⚠️No tech stack filtering
⚠️CSV export capped on most plans
⚠️No free plan — paid from day one
Full comparison
Feature by feature.
No cherry-picking.
Every criterion that matters for B2B prospecting — assessed without spin.
| Criteria | Leadvixo | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Data quality | ||
| Contact database size | 200M+ | ~100M+ |
| Real-time email verification (SMTP) | ✓ | Partial |
| Email deliverability rate | 94%+ | ~85–88% |
| Direct phone & mobile numbers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tech stack / technographic filtering | ✓ 500+ | ✗ |
| Company firmographic search | ✓ 32M+ | Basic |
| GDPR-compliant data sourcing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow & export | ||
| LinkedIn Chrome extension | ✓ | ✓ Core feature |
| Unlimited CSV export on paid plans | ✓ | Capped |
| Native CRM push (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lemlist / outreach tool integration | ✓ | Limited |
| Zapier integration | ✓ | Limited |
| Bulk CSV enrichment | ✓ | Paid add-on |
| REST API access | Scale plan | Higher tiers |
| Team & pricing | ||
| Free plan (no card required) | ✓ 100 credits | ✗ |
| Flat team pricing (no per-seat fee) | ✓ | ✗ Per seat |
| Per-rep usage tracking for managers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Setup time | <5 minutes | ~10–15 minutes |
| Team of 5 — monthly cost | €99 flat | ~$180–$300+ (per seat) |
Based on publicly available information as of avril 2026. Subject to change.
Pricing
The number that matters
for a growing team.
Lusha's per-seat model looks fine for a solo user. The math changes fast at team scale.
Leadvixo
Flat team plan
Free
100 credits · no card required
€0
Pro
5,000 credits · 1 user
€49/mo
Scale
15,000 credits · whole team flat
€99/mo
A 5-person team on Scale pays €99/month total. Add a new rep: still €99.
Lusha
Per-seat pricing
Pro
~50 credits/mo · per seat
~$36/seat/mo
Premium
More credits · per seat
~$59/seat/mo
Scale
Per seat · custom credits
Custom
A 5-person team on Premium pays ~$295/month. Add a rep: +$59/mo. CRM integrations and bulk enrichment are paid add-ons on lower tiers.
For a 5-person team: Leadvixo Scale = €99/mo. Lusha Premium = ~$295/mo. That's roughly €180/month — or ~€2,160/year — saved, with unlimited CSV export and tech stack filtering included in Leadvixo that Lusha doesn't offer at all.
Honest recommendation
When to choose
Leadvixo vs Lusha.
Choose Leadvixo if…
- ✓ You do volume prospecting — building lists of 100–1,000+ contacts per campaign where capped exports become a real friction point.
- ✓ Tech stack filtering matters — targeting companies running HubSpot, Salesforce, Shopify, or 500+ other tools is a core part of your ICP definition.
- ✓ You have 2+ reps and want flat pricing — the Scale plan at €99/mo means adding a new SDR costs nothing extra on the data side.
- ✓ You want to prospect at the account level first — build a company list by vertical, size, and tech stack, then drill into contacts within those accounts.
- ✓ You want to test before paying — the free plan gives you 100 verified contacts with no credit card, so you can validate data quality on your actual ICP first.
Choose Lusha if…
- → You're a solo user doing targeted, high-touch outreach — Lusha's polished UI and LinkedIn extension give a very smooth individual daily workflow with minimal friction.
- → Your primary workflow is LinkedIn-native — you spend most prospecting time on LinkedIn profiles and want the Chrome extension as the centrepiece, not a supplemental tool.
- → You prioritise Salesforce integration depth — Lusha's Salesforce connector is mature and well-regarded, particularly for enterprise CRM setups.
Honest note: This comparison is written by the Leadvixo team. Lusha's UI quality and LinkedIn extension experience are genuinely better for solo daily use — we've tried to represent that fairly. If you're a single user doing 20–30 targeted outreaches per week, Lusha's workflow may feel more natural.
Real scenario
A 3-person SDR team
switching from Lusha.
Scenario — 3-person SDR team doing account-based outbound in SaaS
✗ On Lusha
~$177/mo · capped exports · no tech filter
~$59/seat × 3 = $177/mo
CSV export capped — manual workarounds for big lists
No tech stack filter — can't target by tools used
Company search limited to basic filters
Bounce rate ~11% — partial verification
CRM enrichment is a paid add-on
✓ After Leadvixo Scale
€99/mo · unlimited export · full stack
€99/mo for all 3 reps — ~€40/mo saved vs Lusha
Unlimited CSV export — no friction on large campaigns
Tech stack filter unlocked — "Shopify only" or "uses Stripe" targeting
Company search: 32M+ firms with industry and size filters
Bounce rate drops to ~4% with real-time SMTP verify
HubSpot and Salesforce sync included on Scale
The workflow shift: this team moved from starting every day on LinkedIn profiles (Lusha's natural habitat) to building account lists in Leadvixo by tech stack, then working those accounts across both the platform and the Chrome extension on LinkedIn. The result: 3× more accounts worked per week with the same headcount.
FAQ
Questions about
Leadvixo vs Lusha.
Both tools offer verified emails and direct phone numbers. The key difference is verification method: Leadvixo validates every email via SMTP check at the point of reveal, which is why deliverability stays above 94%. Lusha uses a combination of real-time and cached verification depending on the contact. In practice, Leadvixo's bounce rate tends to be lower — around 4% vs 10–15% reported by Lusha users on review platforms. For phone numbers, both tools are comparable in global coverage; Lusha may have a slight edge on certain North American markets.
Lusha was built primarily as a contact enrichment tool — you find someone on LinkedIn, you reveal their email and phone. Technographic data (knowing what software a company uses) requires a separate data layer that Lusha hasn't integrated. Leadvixo was built as a full prospecting platform from the start, so tech stack filtering — covering 500+ technologies including CRM tools, e-commerce platforms, marketing automation, cloud infrastructure, and more — is a core filter in both the people and company search. For B2B products and services where "companies using X tool" is a meaningful ICP signal, this gap is significant.
Lusha's credit model ties exports to per-contact credits, which are capped on each plan tier. Once you've used your monthly credits, you can't export more until the next billing cycle — or you pay for more. This makes sense for individual users doing targeted outreach on 20–50 contacts per week. For SDR teams building lists of 200–1,000 contacts per campaign, it creates friction. Leadvixo's unlimited CSV export on paid plans means no rationing decisions — you build the list you need and export it in full.
Yes. Leadvixo's Chrome extension works on LinkedIn profiles and company pages — you reveal emails and phone numbers directly while browsing, without switching to another tab. Lusha's extension is more deeply optimised for the LinkedIn experience and has a more polished inline UI. For teams where LinkedIn browsing is a significant part of the daily sourcing workflow, both extensions work well; Lusha's may feel slightly more native if LinkedIn is your primary prospecting surface.
Yes — and we recommend it. Leadvixo's free plan gives you 100 credits/month with no credit card required. Use it to reveal 100 contacts from your actual ICP and check the email deliverability and phone coverage against what you're getting from Lusha today. If the data holds up — and if tech stack filtering and unlimited export matter to your workflow — the switch becomes straightforward. If it doesn't, the free plan costs you nothing to find out.
Free plan · 100 credits · no card needed
Verified data. Better pricing.
Unlimited export.
Try every Leadvixo feature on your actual ICP before spending anything. People search, company search, tech stack filtering — all unlocked on the free plan.
100 free credits
No credit card required
Live in under 2 minutes
GDPR compliant